Did you know that Satan will willfully and without Your fully informed consent will hurt or kill Your flesh? Also will damages something You own, in full or in part? And will defraud You (which can and will happen with Your informed consent!) Did you know that Jesus was witnessed and documented to do miracles, rise the dead, die then rise from the dead himself, all to save you from Satan's Hell? So who will you be voting for in your next life, after this short temporary one? Inquiring minds want to know!
Steve, presuming this “Satan” exists (I have no evidence thereof, but… [shrug], I guess that would be true. But any God who rejects Me because I did not assuage His ego with worship. despite that I am Ethical, loving, caring, giving, and have devoted My life to freeing Humanity from the psychopaths in control (who, I guess can absolve Themselves merely by worshiping and repenting at the very last moment), enduring all the issues the psychopaths deliver to Me…
How do we civilized people get murder convictions based on only circumstantial evidence? I.e., no solid evidence or body? Duh, can’t explain that, can you?
Yes, many Christians believe that Jesus is sovereign. This belief is rooted in the New Testament, where Jesus is depicted as having authority over nature, demons, sickness, death, and salvation. Jesus's sovereign authority is also affirmed in passages where he is given "all authority in heaven and on earth".
I bet silly ignorant people like you would have ask our founding fathers to referian from mentioning "Our Creator " / God as the foundation of all our Constittional righrs and Law! Right? It's why you can't lucidely explain where Law comes from! Right?
Oooo. Nice ad hominem, there, Steve. You’re welcome to get all religious if You want to, but I would appreciate it if You remained on topic rather than dragging it in where it really is not a fit.
Where do the three Laws come from? Nature. If You ask anyOne if it’s okay to do those things to Them, They will say “no” and to say “yes” is consenting, leaving the question unanswered.
These are Natural Law (do no harm) expressed as the things not to do.
The more you talk, the sillier you sound! I.e., the "Our Creator", that our founders cited, regarding our Law just evolved in nature, like all other complex, symbiotic life! I.e. no creator God involved! Right? Did you know that Albert Einstein couldn’t believe that silly evolution crap, as you do?
Im the only masochist who answered yes! And its not even to make fun. I accept the first law if its from a flesh elderly of mine who without me knowing of course, would come and hurt me to teach me something, can be martial training, or to be always on guard, or just a good ol spank if i had bad behaved.
I accept the second term because material as no value, it will be sad for me, but its even sadder for who does it. And if we cant make mistake, where is the learning process and the need for redemption? Also, every material is a boulder to carry, if they liberate me im free.
And i also accept the third term, if i got defraud, i wasnt wise enough to protect myself from it. Than when it will have fallen unto me, i can surely teach to others how to protect from it. So its another learning process needed to be vigilant. Plus who knows! Maybe ill find a solution to that fraud later and be the cure to that virus. Can make a living of this.
I know its not perfect utopia. But we live in a world were we are all free of our action and to bear the consequence, none is good nor bad, they are all subject to morality that as been forged by humanity belief. Unkess we that alien guy from Kpax movie lol
Overall i love turning lead to gold, in this case its bad luck into blessing.
Peace amaterasu! I am eager for next week when you will answer this poll.
Btw, i never do poll but for you and that great question i did! And my answers are serious.
There are nuances to the willful part. It is possible given the current situation that someone may do these things willfully but without full innerstanding. Many have clouded pine-al glands and many have been programmed and tortured through the system. That doesn’t mean that I don’t have a right to ethical treatment but it’s a side effect of the psychopathic system.
love the swap of understanding to innerstanding, but understanding as some sens too. its the opposite of over standing, and to stand on something you got to build it from under to over.
i really love innerstanding tho, so what is outerstanding? both understanding and overstanding if its phisical? Cause innerstanding is obliged to be spiritual, by duality law it would make outerstanding either spirituality of things outside yourself, or material and include both under and overstanding.
wich one it is i dunno yet, cause the moment i rade your word it click. gotta take time to meditate on that word. really love it =) thanks
pssst btw: i've been tortured a lot, not sure for the programmed since i always been rebelious but sure thing for the torture! But i am not implying that no one deserve an ethical treatment, i'm just saying it is a certain possibility in this world of freedom that unethical stuff can happens by mistake while someone is willfully thinking of doing something good. Like many other possibilities may happen. No need to be on side effect to under\inner\outer\over\stand that ;) close or open pinecone from the trees of knowledge...either way one is, one can see the infinite possibility causing the liberty of each to go against rules. willfully or not.
We just need to propose lots of tempting way to make people decide by themself to act gentlemanly, and willfuly means not by any forced laws. right? So who wants to do good cause it feels good? i sure do! thats where the psychopath are teaching everyone to fail in their action. Carrot and stick, or money and slavery lol. brings the citizen to act accordingly.
ya know, i was confused at that part, and even now after you explaining it simply... i am still confused. what kinda of use is a poll of two answer and one that cant be developped while the other can?
If i say yes like i did, i have to bring no justification? while whoever says no can supply is tought? I'm basicly pinpointing the fact that pain can be a teacher too, and mistake will always occur in a world of 8 billion people all free of their action (or more like reaction) So it has to be this unjust way the world is working on...to be a world of justice.
All i know is that the world will never be as my utopia, where every living creature is safe and free from anything bad happening. As much as the world will never be like the globalist elitist sure wish it gets to... a world of total control and despair were no one can grow.
So help me out, i am confused, i thought id answer greatly and in the end i didnt answered at all it seems according to the rules of your poll. and life as its own rules btw
then if all it needs is to retract my answer to fill the yes. i'll retract them, knowing you already rade them. My opinion may change when i'll read your piece next week. Its up to you to show me that it is possible to live by these 3 ethic laws in a jungle world we are in. Without overulling freedom of the other. Its the same dillema all our ancestor had back then, and still have today. 2\3 live one way 1\3 live the other way, it swap from time to time, thats basicly it. fits with bible and fallen angels lol
The point of My work is to bring these Laws back to society (they are ancient). And trash the psychopathic legal/governmental system in favor of them, and a solutocracy for solving problems.
And how would We "overrule" any freedoms when One can do any Ethical thing One chooses? As long as these Laws are not broken, We will live in peace.
Well, I would not call what I aim for a “utopia,” per se. But surely it is better by leaps, bounds, and wormhole trips than what We have today. There still will be problems, but with the solutocracy, solving problems Ethically, rather than passing legalates and enFORCING them… Problems will be solve for.
If there's sort of an "individual warfare" scenario - say I've lost my mind or let my anger get the best of me and I decide to go on a rampage, injuring others or ending their lives - even if it's "obviously & odiously guilty" others (like at a Federal Reserve Bank Board Meeting or the floor of the Senate when Congress is in session) - then yes, someone else does have the right to injure/incapacitate or even "end" me without my express permission - as a self-protective response. But that's about the only time I can think of there being a valid "Yes" answer for the first question.
Only in immediate situations is deadly force Ethical. Arresting, trying, and meting Ethical consequences if found guilty is the way to proceed for anything that is not an immediate defense of Self and Others.
I would not be inclined to act in such a way while "myself". But if I (or anyone) has truly lost their mind to madness, then who the heck knows what that person would do. I think under those conditions, the ability of rational choice would no longer exist. And so if such an afflicted person was going on a homicidal rampage, then I think it would be acceptable for others to use force to take them out, if needed.
Well, it is wrong (unEthical) to do these things. Irrespective of any "lost mind." Perhaps when One has such loss, and breaks the three Laws (which these represent), One can convince a jury that it was just fine.
As for stopping immediate threats, yeah. If need be, deadly force is acceptable. But that is reactionary, not willful.
DOCTORS/MEDICS/NURSES/POLITICIANS/PHARMA/MSM/COUNCILS/UNIS/EDUCATION/COPS/ESTABLISHMENT/CELEBS etc ) knew that they would be MAIMING and MURDERING people by firstly the DNR/MORPHINE/MIDAZOLAM SLAUGHTER and then followed by the POISON JABS. The POISON JABS were being delivered late 2020 and the 'POWERS THAT BE' already were well aware of the dangers of the POISON JABS but it was hidden from the PEOPLE ROUND THE WORLD! From day one the POISON JAB GHOULS must have seen adverse reactions and by end of 2020 well aware of deaths but the SATANIC EVIL !(STARD CONTINUED!? BEGGARS BELIEF and BOGGLES THE MIND!?
It's why Big Pharma "medicine" in just the last 50 years has killed [with their iatrogenic "medicine"] 10 to 19 million, more the ALL USA's 250 years of war dead!m [Fact!]
How could all that evil be done without the help of Satan and his boys???
Very true the moneyed psychopaths in control have been choosing unEthical behaviors. In relation to the plannedemic, the death jabs, and much more. And so Many were blinded by lies, even as They delivered the "medicine." Many knew but had families that depended on Them, and chose to go along to get along, not losing Their job...
I discuss a solution to those moneyed psychopaths here:
The above groups/industries have been practicing and performing their functions on a usually captive audience/participants for the last hundred years (or more) so this is just one mass open scale event. Great rewards for those in this life who've done these inhumanities and just rewards await them in their soul's lives.
I think We should solve for those moneyed psychopaths in control... We have the tech to obsolete Their ONLY tool to power, but They do hide it avidly. Irrespective of form - from goods/services (trade/barter) to metals and paper (coins and bills) to electronic bits.
Did you know that Satan will willfully and without Your fully informed consent will hurt or kill Your flesh? Also will damages something You own, in full or in part? And will defraud You (which can and will happen with Your informed consent!) Did you know that Jesus was witnessed and documented to do miracles, rise the dead, die then rise from the dead himself, all to save you from Satan's Hell? So who will you be voting for in your next life, after this short temporary one? Inquiring minds want to know!
Steve, presuming this “Satan” exists (I have no evidence thereof, but… [shrug], I guess that would be true. But any God who rejects Me because I did not assuage His ego with worship. despite that I am Ethical, loving, caring, giving, and have devoted My life to freeing Humanity from the psychopaths in control (who, I guess can absolve Themselves merely by worshiping and repenting at the very last moment), enduring all the issues the psychopaths deliver to Me…
Well, I ponder worshiping such a One.
Love always.
How do we civilized people get murder convictions based on only circumstantial evidence? I.e., no solid evidence or body? Duh, can’t explain that, can you?
How is that relevant? Moneyed interests/power is how. Anyway, I will be gifting You with My second block on Substack if You don't leave Me alone.
Can you remember claiming no evidence for God or Jesus? Well I tryed to explane to you how the real world works! Sorry I wasted your time!
Voting is compulsory in Australia.
Only if You consent to that system… If You’re not ready to stand sovereign, yeah.
Just Stop Consenting! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/just-stop-consenting
AND
Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical
AI Overview
Yes, many Christians believe that Jesus is sovereign. This belief is rooted in the New Testament, where Jesus is depicted as having authority over nature, demons, sickness, death, and salvation. Jesus's sovereign authority is also affirmed in passages where he is given "all authority in heaven and on earth".
Please refrain from bringing in religion where it is not being discussed. Thank You in advance.
I bet silly ignorant people like you would have ask our founding fathers to referian from mentioning "Our Creator " / God as the foundation of all our Constittional righrs and Law! Right? It's why you can't lucidely explain where Law comes from! Right?
Oooo. Nice ad hominem, there, Steve. You’re welcome to get all religious if You want to, but I would appreciate it if You remained on topic rather than dragging it in where it really is not a fit.
Where do the three Laws come from? Nature. If You ask anyOne if it’s okay to do those things to Them, They will say “no” and to say “yes” is consenting, leaving the question unanswered.
These are Natural Law (do no harm) expressed as the things not to do.
The more you talk, the sillier you sound! I.e., the "Our Creator", that our founders cited, regarding our Law just evolved in nature, like all other complex, symbiotic life! I.e. no creator God involved! Right? Did you know that Albert Einstein couldn’t believe that silly evolution crap, as you do?
I honestly chose to click the least sensible poll answer
Okay… Not Your real answer (which is what I asked for…)?
Voting sux
No One forced Ya to... LOL! Inputting dishonest responses to an honest poll seems... Less than honorable. Just saying.
Im the only masochist who answered yes! And its not even to make fun. I accept the first law if its from a flesh elderly of mine who without me knowing of course, would come and hurt me to teach me something, can be martial training, or to be always on guard, or just a good ol spank if i had bad behaved.
I accept the second term because material as no value, it will be sad for me, but its even sadder for who does it. And if we cant make mistake, where is the learning process and the need for redemption? Also, every material is a boulder to carry, if they liberate me im free.
And i also accept the third term, if i got defraud, i wasnt wise enough to protect myself from it. Than when it will have fallen unto me, i can surely teach to others how to protect from it. So its another learning process needed to be vigilant. Plus who knows! Maybe ill find a solution to that fraud later and be the cure to that virus. Can make a living of this.
I know its not perfect utopia. But we live in a world were we are all free of our action and to bear the consequence, none is good nor bad, they are all subject to morality that as been forged by humanity belief. Unkess we that alien guy from Kpax movie lol
Overall i love turning lead to gold, in this case its bad luck into blessing.
Peace amaterasu! I am eager for next week when you will answer this poll.
Btw, i never do poll but for you and that great question i did! And my answers are serious.
Gah, you beat me!
Lololololol 🤣😂😅😁😉😁
There are nuances to the willful part. It is possible given the current situation that someone may do these things willfully but without full innerstanding. Many have clouded pine-al glands and many have been programmed and tortured through the system. That doesn’t mean that I don’t have a right to ethical treatment but it’s a side effect of the psychopathic system.
love the swap of understanding to innerstanding, but understanding as some sens too. its the opposite of over standing, and to stand on something you got to build it from under to over.
i really love innerstanding tho, so what is outerstanding? both understanding and overstanding if its phisical? Cause innerstanding is obliged to be spiritual, by duality law it would make outerstanding either spirituality of things outside yourself, or material and include both under and overstanding.
wich one it is i dunno yet, cause the moment i rade your word it click. gotta take time to meditate on that word. really love it =) thanks
pssst btw: i've been tortured a lot, not sure for the programmed since i always been rebelious but sure thing for the torture! But i am not implying that no one deserve an ethical treatment, i'm just saying it is a certain possibility in this world of freedom that unethical stuff can happens by mistake while someone is willfully thinking of doing something good. Like many other possibilities may happen. No need to be on side effect to under\inner\outer\over\stand that ;) close or open pinecone from the trees of knowledge...either way one is, one can see the infinite possibility causing the liberty of each to go against rules. willfully or not.
We just need to propose lots of tempting way to make people decide by themself to act gentlemanly, and willfuly means not by any forced laws. right? So who wants to do good cause it feels good? i sure do! thats where the psychopath are teaching everyone to fail in their action. Carrot and stick, or money and slavery lol. brings the citizen to act accordingly.
Then You did not answer the question. To answer "yes" is to consent and leaves the question unanswered.
just tought about this! how am i gonna pay you if i dont answer! so by this third shoot out i just paid you triple ;) sweet sweet sweet =)
good evening to you my solar ray of hope =)
for a world without money ;)
on that we agree=)
🙏🏻 💜 🙏🏻
ya know, i was confused at that part, and even now after you explaining it simply... i am still confused. what kinda of use is a poll of two answer and one that cant be developped while the other can?
If i say yes like i did, i have to bring no justification? while whoever says no can supply is tought? I'm basicly pinpointing the fact that pain can be a teacher too, and mistake will always occur in a world of 8 billion people all free of their action (or more like reaction) So it has to be this unjust way the world is working on...to be a world of justice.
All i know is that the world will never be as my utopia, where every living creature is safe and free from anything bad happening. As much as the world will never be like the globalist elitist sure wish it gets to... a world of total control and despair were no one can grow.
So help me out, i am confused, i thought id answer greatly and in the end i didnt answered at all it seems according to the rules of your poll. and life as its own rules btw
then if all it needs is to retract my answer to fill the yes. i'll retract them, knowing you already rade them. My opinion may change when i'll read your piece next week. Its up to you to show me that it is possible to live by these 3 ethic laws in a jungle world we are in. Without overulling freedom of the other. Its the same dillema all our ancestor had back then, and still have today. 2\3 live one way 1\3 live the other way, it swap from time to time, thats basicly it. fits with bible and fallen angels lol
The point of My work is to bring these Laws back to society (they are ancient). And trash the psychopathic legal/governmental system in favor of them, and a solutocracy for solving problems.
And how would We "overrule" any freedoms when One can do any Ethical thing One chooses? As long as these Laws are not broken, We will live in peace.
Solutocracy – A Way to Govern (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/solutocracy-a-way-to-govern
Beneath the Beasts! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/beneath-the-beasts
Ethical Anarchy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/ethical-anarchy
Utopia is the goal, way to get is yet a mistery. I will read these links ,maybe i find something towards this goal.
Thanks ☀️🌞☀️
Well, I would not call what I aim for a “utopia,” per se. But surely it is better by leaps, bounds, and wormhole trips than what We have today. There still will be problems, but with the solutocracy, solving problems Ethically, rather than passing legalates and enFORCING them… Problems will be solve for.
Love always!
If there's sort of an "individual warfare" scenario - say I've lost my mind or let my anger get the best of me and I decide to go on a rampage, injuring others or ending their lives - even if it's "obviously & odiously guilty" others (like at a Federal Reserve Bank Board Meeting or the floor of the Senate when Congress is in session) - then yes, someone else does have the right to injure/incapacitate or even "end" me without my express permission - as a self-protective response. But that's about the only time I can think of there being a valid "Yes" answer for the first question.
Only in immediate situations is deadly force Ethical. Arresting, trying, and meting Ethical consequences if found guilty is the way to proceed for anything that is not an immediate defense of Self and Others.
You are responsible for the behaviors You choose.
I would not be inclined to act in such a way while "myself". But if I (or anyone) has truly lost their mind to madness, then who the heck knows what that person would do. I think under those conditions, the ability of rational choice would no longer exist. And so if such an afflicted person was going on a homicidal rampage, then I think it would be acceptable for others to use force to take them out, if needed.
Well, it is wrong (unEthical) to do these things. Irrespective of any "lost mind." Perhaps when One has such loss, and breaks the three Laws (which these represent), One can convince a jury that it was just fine.
As for stopping immediate threats, yeah. If need be, deadly force is acceptable. But that is reactionary, not willful.
DOCTORS/MEDICS/NURSES/POLITICIANS/PHARMA/MSM/COUNCILS/UNIS/EDUCATION/COPS/ESTABLISHMENT/CELEBS etc ) knew that they would be MAIMING and MURDERING people by firstly the DNR/MORPHINE/MIDAZOLAM SLAUGHTER and then followed by the POISON JABS. The POISON JABS were being delivered late 2020 and the 'POWERS THAT BE' already were well aware of the dangers of the POISON JABS but it was hidden from the PEOPLE ROUND THE WORLD! From day one the POISON JAB GHOULS must have seen adverse reactions and by end of 2020 well aware of deaths but the SATANIC EVIL !(STARD CONTINUED!? BEGGARS BELIEF and BOGGLES THE MIND!?
It's why Big Pharma "medicine" in just the last 50 years has killed [with their iatrogenic "medicine"] 10 to 19 million, more the ALL USA's 250 years of war dead!m [Fact!]
How could all that evil be done without the help of Satan and his boys???
Very true the moneyed psychopaths in control have been choosing unEthical behaviors. In relation to the plannedemic, the death jabs, and much more. And so Many were blinded by lies, even as They delivered the "medicine." Many knew but had families that depended on Them, and chose to go along to get along, not losing Their job...
I discuss a solution to those moneyed psychopaths here:
Beneath the Beasts! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/beneath-the-beasts
The above groups/industries have been practicing and performing their functions on a usually captive audience/participants for the last hundred years (or more) so this is just one mass open scale event. Great rewards for those in this life who've done these inhumanities and just rewards await them in their soul's lives.
I think We should solve for those moneyed psychopaths in control... We have the tech to obsolete Their ONLY tool to power, but They do hide it avidly. Irrespective of form - from goods/services (trade/barter) to metals and paper (coins and bills) to electronic bits.
Obsoleting Money (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/obsoleting-money