Ethical Anarchy

As opposed to legal government

Many are still under the thrall of the besmirchment efforts of the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet to paint anarchy as pandemonium. They think that without government Humans would devolve into radical messes. The moneyed psychopaths have put forth much effort in getting that association to be made when the term, “anarchy,” is brought up.

Government (the legal/governmental system) is what They use for the illusion that They have “authority” and We had best comply.

In this way, They can make it “legal” to do most anything to Us. Hide poisons in Our food, jab Us with toxins and who knows what else with no liability, lie to Us on the “news” (all “news” outlets are legally “entertainment,” and so have no obligation to inform Us honestly), arrest Us for collecting rain water, allow toxic manufacturing waste to be sold to water suppliers to add to the water with lies that it helps Us…

The list goes on and on. I do not doubt You can find plenty more unEthical things that are “legal.”

This power leads Them to berate and hide anything that might threaten Their power over Us. And anarchy, which is no rulers (not no rules), would strip Them of any “authority” They have convinced so Many that They have.

In fact… No One has authority over any Other. I cannot say I have authority over You and You cannot say You have authority over Me. You cannot say, “Jack Someone has authority over all of Us,” because Most of Us “voted” for Jack to have authority.

The Ones who “voted” for Jack can accept Jack’s authority, but They cannot say Jack has authority over You or Me, unless We consent to Jack’s “rule” too. Consent is the key.

In anarchy, We have Self authority, and therefore may do any Ethical thing We choose. We are sovereign Ones. The rules of anarchy, really, the Laws, are the three Laws of Ethics.

The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):

1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther

2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone

3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

And sure, We can bow to another’s “authority” if We choose. But We surely cannot force Others to do so as well. And force is the key. Forcing someOne is stealing Their freedom. It breaks the second Law. (If You choose to break any of Laws, You forfeit Your sovereignty, and receive any Ethical consequences the Ones who care choose to deliver.)

The legal(/governmental) system is most frequently unEthical. Though They call what is in that system “laws,” they are not Laws. They are legalates. They are Human-devised demands, virtually all of which are involved with commerce, one way or another. See Calling a Legalate a Law linked below.

And so, Ethical anarchy is the highest form of social structure. It allows Us complete freedom within the Laws.

And given that most of the legal system is involved in commerce, propping the wealthy and Their corp(se)orations, often with unEthical legalates, it becomes clear that if We removed the need for exchanging to survive, removed the accounting for Our energy added into a system, removed the need for money in any form from trade/barter up to electronic bits, that whole legal system becomes pointless, and redundant in the few cases where it upholds the Laws.

And yes, We have the tech to be rid of that psychopathic tool. Of course, the moneyed psychopaths (promoted to the top by money) avidly hide and suppress free energy technologies which would make accounting for Our energy added into a system pointless.

It’s up to Us to co-create better here for Humanity and which will include Us.

It’s up to Us to stop consenting to the psychopathic legal/governmental mess and stand sovereign on Ethical ground – much higher ground than the legal sewer. And if We can, get the free energy tech out in the open – no patents! Patents give Them a heads up and They will swoop in to “solve for the problem.”

Do You want what the moneyed psychopaths are leading Us to? 15 minute prisons, bugs to eat, CBDC’s and social credit scores to pull Our strings with, and neuralinked like Borg? If so, keep consenting.

But if You want freedom for Yourself and Humanity, cease consenting to Their rule!

.

.

---

As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.

.

.

Links to My work for Humanity:

.

Calling a Legalate a Law (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/calling-a-legalate-a-law

The GentleOne’s Solution (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-gentleones-solution

Just Stop Consenting! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/just-stop-consenting

Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical

Electrogravitics – My Knowledge of Free Energy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/electrogravitics-my-knowledge-of

You Are a Multimillionaire (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/you-are-a-multimillionaire

.

.

---

.

Signature:

.

Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia

Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change

The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella

.

My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.

I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"

When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.

From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).

I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...

I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.

And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.

Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?

And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.

So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.

.

Love always.