28 Comments
User's avatar
29,000 Tons of Thermite's avatar

I love it that you always propuse or recommend a solution. 👌🙏✍️

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

🙏🏻 💜 🙏🏻 We surely do have a major problem, and I was blessed to see a solution… So… It is My duty to offer solutions. [hugs]

Expand full comment
Friar Tuck's avatar

Section 3 of the Act of Settlement 1700 provides that no person born out of England, Scotland or Ireland, or the dominions thereto, is capable of being a member of Parliament. The provision does not apply to Commonwealth citizens or citizens of the Republic of Ireland under s52(6) of and Schedule 7 to the British Nationality Act 1981, so they are able to stand without having been born in the UK or indeed without being resident there or appearing on the electoral register. There are residential qualifications for candidates for local authorities.

https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN05357/SN05357.pdf

British Nationality Act 1948

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/11-12/56/enacted

Graham goes through it 24m in

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W1NCfdHKJ0M&pp=0gcJCRsBo7VqN5tD

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Well, I am hoping We stop consenting to the whole psychopathic legal/governmafia system, stand sovereign on Ethical ground (under the three Laws of Ethics ONLY - the ONLY Laws) and while We're at it, obsolete money (in all forms).

I withdrew My consent from that mess...

Ethical Anarchy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/ethical-anarchy

Obsoleting Money (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/obsoleting-money

The GentleOne’s Solution (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-gentleones-solution

Creating Controversy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/creating-controversy

Just Stop Consenting! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/just-stop-consenting

AND

Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

I outright do not consent to that whole psychopathic legal/governmafia mess. I will be happy to be subject if anyOne can prove I am in Their jurisdiction.

I stand under the three Laws of Ethics ONLY, and don’t bother with the convolutions of that system. I am hoping Many choose to stand sovereign with Me.

Calling a Legalate a Law (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/calling-a-legalate-a-law

Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical

Expand full comment
Jade's avatar

When I told my local council that I didn't know that it was an election on, after they sent me a fine for not voting, the fine got scrapped. I told the truth also.

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

I would not identify any governmafia element (“council”) as “Mine…” I don’t consent to the whole psychopathic legal/governmental mess.

But glad They chose to leave You alone… I do ponder being “fined” for not “voting…” If it were Me, I would have said, “I will be happy to pay this if You prove I am in Your jurisdiction.

As I do not consent to any system that places anyOne above anOther, there is no proof I am subject to any system, therefore, not in the jurisdiction.

Expand full comment
The Researcher's avatar

Implied Consent. Invisible Contracts. This is how the cryptocracy function.

I refuse all authority systems, any and all corporations claiming authority over anyone. It starts and ends with false authority, which is the most dangerous superstition:

https://www.mensenrechten.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/the-most-dangerous-superstition-larken-rose-20111.pdf

The usurping of natural law — which are unchangeable, immutable principles based on objective morality and reason, that govern all actions and behavior of men and women have been occulted, then replaced by the unlawful legal system which only functions through fraud, mass deception, fear and debt slavery using the constant threat of violence, kidnap and death.

Invisible contracts occur when we’re forced to use legal tender:

https://www.educatedinlaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Mercier-Invisible-Contracts-law-as-legalized-slavery1984.pdf

This is the reason the cryptocracy monopolize the money system. Money, which is no more than a mechanism or tool - a means of exchange - becomes a bondage system where courts operate as banks:

http://www.labie.lv/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ckk-courts-are-bankers.pdf

All courts operate under “color of law”.

colorable: That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be. Counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance of truth.

Black's Law Dictionary.

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Bingo! Moi aussie!

I think the three Laws of Ethics are nice and clear expression of Natural Law:

The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):

1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther

2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone

3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

I can’t think of anything outside of those things that is not a matter of taste.

Expand full comment
Anne's avatar

Another example is Bart Simpson doing helicopter arms and if Lisa were to walk into them it's her fault. I find it hard to believe that any fully functioning adult would really believe that that is giving full consent - except of course Elon Musk as he is clearly a moron.

As for the law, I have always wondered why it's not written in a black and white definitive way instead of having so much grey area and I think it's so the elite can side step all laws - there really is no other reason.

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Well, there are only three Laws, and They’re written quite clearly:

The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):

1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther

2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone

3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

But the purveyors of the legal system call Their legalates “laws” to get Us to think We must follow them.

Expand full comment
Anne's avatar

True but how do we get back to that?

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Withdraw Our consent, standing under the three Laws ONLY, and deal with the system under duress. And share awareness that We CAN do that.

And the best thing is to strip Them of their single tool to power...

Obsoleting Money (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/obsoleting-money

Expand full comment
Anne's avatar

It would take a lifetime to change from money to something else and don't forget the elites have been grooming people to be selfish, lazy, aggressive and addicted to over consumption of everything for decades now along with everything else they are doing, it would need something with a lot more depth to it to put a dent in their plans but a good starting point would be for everyone to sell all their shares so as to cut off some of their income.

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

Satanism, tells you what it wants to do, then does what it wants to do. You can stop it, but not by just being right. You have to stop satanism by organizing, taking the power together, and doing what you want to do together, and that, my friend, is politics.

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

LOL! I have seen so Many join groups and… Nothing happens.

And I suspect You are not grasping “politics…”

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

I grasp politics, and the elite grasp it, Amaterasu Solar.

The elites are very cooperative indeed, and very divisive in all kinds of ways, luring the people through their media and infiltrators.

I grasp it, but most regular folks don't.

"Many groups" is NOT the problem, but in fact a strength. It can increase flexibility. However, they must cooperate broadly politically, with a few common goals, that also people can agree with 80-99%, and not choose stuff repeated by the MSM manure, like CO2 climate warming, where data can be interpreted differently, like seeing a coming ice age soon in the data. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary_glaciation#/media/File:Milankovitch_Variations.png

If fake leaders refuse to cooperate broadly, then remove those fake leaders, or make new group that grasp it, and join those new groups, and attack the ones not cooperating broadly! Give it to them constantly! Call them controlled opposition, because they are, knowingly or unknowingly! They are the enemy of the people, until they cooperate broadly and actively, without sloth, Amaterasu Solar!

That is not an opinion, but simply completely evident.

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Personally, I see no need for a governmafia. Of any kind. Guessing You’re not reading My articles of I don’t think You would be failing to grasp what I am saying and suggesting.

As I have bone spurs in My old thumbs, and typing hurts, I will drop this discussion here. If You read some of My work, and leave a comment, I will surely respond.

Love always!

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

Be truthful, Amaterasu Solar! Truth only wants to help you. Let evident truth help you! Mentally healthy people, governing openly, ethically and legally, through critical thinking, true reasoning without fallacies, and direct democracy, are evidently NOT a "governing mafia". That is real democracy, in the real and original sense of the word.

Expand full comment
Anne's avatar

Democracy is the majority vote rules (and funnily enough we only get to vote on very few things) but unfortunately the majority of the population are below average IQ and that's a (sad) fact

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

Yes, correct Anne. Democracy is majority vote rules. Creativity, huge consensus and compassion is ethical to strive for, of course, making everybody as happy as possible. 95% will do that after education in creativity and ethics, since they are not psychopaths.

At the moment, a minority of rich psychopaths rule through the monopoly capitalist Una party, and the majority dislikes it. Very unethical. Very undemocratic, however people mostly voted for it for decades, or abstained, thus changing nothing, because of negativity or sloth, which is not ethical, in my opinion.

How many things you will be able to vote for, in the future, only you and others will decide together, by organizing and voting for real democracy, or not being motivated to do that.

https://www.friendsofthelincolncollection.org/lincoln-lore/lincoln-and-democracy/

...and if you choose not to be motivated, then I believe the chicken will come home to roost, eventually...

High IQ is nice if you also have a positive, constructive mind. I have it. However, only high IQ and no compassion, no ethics, can be devastating. Hitler had high IQ. Total war and total defeat. Very sad for the Germans and all of the victims of the satanic Nazism, ethnicity cleansing and exterminating people.

So IQ is only one part of intelligence. I investigated other forms of intelligence (page is in Swedish):

https://vetenskapligapartiet.wordpress.com/2019/02/24/olika-former-av-logn-del-1-iq-ar-inte-samma-sak-som-intelligens/

,,, and since I presume you have a high IQ, I guess you will figure out how to translate it, Anne. ;-)

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Actually, the IQ (for what THAT's worth) is irrelevant. The governmafia is a for-profit corp(se)oration (USA since 1871), and the owners appoint the officers. They hold "elections" to maintain the illusion We have a say...

They "count the votes" and tell Us who "won" (who They appointed).

We could vote 99% of one of Their "choices," but if it's not the appointed One, They will tell Us 51% voted for the One They want in the CEO position (or whatever position).

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Why is anything beyond the Laws of Ethics needed? And what if 51% vote to take the homes of the 49% to do [whatever]?

Demo(n)cracy is ghastly. No One has "authority" over anyOne else, and cannot "vote" to make choices for Others. There are only three Laws.

I offer (and hope You choose to read):

Ethical Anarchy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/ethical-anarchy

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

It is unethical to use platitudes like "freedom" unless you use them in context, in my opinion.

Like: The freedom of not being poor or in slavery situation. The freedom of walking in the forest where ever and when ever you like, like in Sweden. The freedom of not being robbed at gunpoint. The freedom of integrity without surveillance. The freedom of feeling safe. The freedom of owning a piece of land. The freedom of watching healthy nature and wild life. The freedom of hunting.

Clearly, since planet earth is finite, not infinite, for example when studying hare and Lynx populations fluctuating up and down, it is self-evident that we need rules to live in balance, and to uphold them, in order to balance different kinds of freedoms!

Wise thoughts:

https://www.friendsofthelincolncollection.org/lincoln-lore/lincoln-and-democracy/

USA has some direct democracy here and there:

https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/democracy/why-the-us-and-switzerland-are-direct-democracy-sister-republics/87536566

Expand full comment
albert venezio's avatar

I don't consent to most everything government does!

Expand full comment