Do not hurt or kill? Every breath you take is consuming oxygen that someone else could use to keep alive; it's impossible to live without hurting others and killing plants and/or animals (at the least).
Don't take or damage what belongs to others? Everything and everyone actually belongs to whatever government protects you from being killed by other governments, but (for sake of argument) let's call "what is yours" anything that you have created WITHOUT USING ANYTHING THAT YOU HAVEN'T CREATED: in other words, exactly NOTHING; everything you create is created by a mind, body and society that exist solely due to the government's defense of your part of ITS domain. If your government can't protect you, then you end up DEAD (like the Canaanites, or in open air prisons like the North American indigenous and the Palestinians, etc etc.)
NB. "The Government" is a scalable concept: if you are the only person on a deserted island, then "the government" is YOU; should you have children on your deserted island, then YOU are the government of your children. Should some pirates show up and throw you and your kids in chains, then it's pretty clear who the government is NOW: if you can't defend it, then you don't own it.
Don't Defraud???? Sorry to have to break it to you, but your whole schtick is an attempt to DEFRAUD your readers regarding the REALITY OF OUR SITUATION: if WE aren't the government, then WE ARE PROPERTY. Should you care to help me in my quest to enable WE THE PEOPLE to "take over the reins of government", find alanforcongress in the Library of Congress
Did You see the word, “willfully?” Did You see the word, “anOther?” Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of s sentient, sapient Being. i.e., Human or ET.
No, actually, the controlminds (governments) only operate with the consent of the governed. If no One consented, standing sovereign on Ethical ground, Those who think They have the mythical status of “authority” would have no power.
And I am not wasting My time on the rest of Your illogical diatribe, complicating the simple.
This is the purest vision of freedom that I have ever seen, simply described because the truth is simple. I wonder however about the distribution of goods. If the product I produce is needed in 100 different locations but I only have enough to send to 50 of them then who and how are the shipping decisions made? Also, if I am a public distribution point (formerly called a store) and I have 50 units of a product but 100 people each want at least one unit then who and how are the distribution decisions made? If the first person wants 5 units then it won't take long to run out of product.
First, everything is first come-first served after the creator gives to the Ones They want to. There is nothing that some Other cannot provide that will fill any need. Maybe there is not enough lobster for All who want lobster, and the first-come get it, but this does not mean everyOne else will starve...
As for quantity offered per Person... That would be the choice of the lobster-provider.
And yes, lobster is likely to run out rapidly, and People will have to make do with shrimp, or clams, or...
I was thinking more about essential products needed to feed the supply chains, things like natural resources, building materials, steel, metals & alloys, primary foodstuffs, machinery & equipment, medical supplies, electronic components, appliances, cars, boats, etc.
Given that We have been making do with what We have produced, and getting it distributed, I doubt there will be a problem once the automation of things takes over all the necessary work no One wants to do. And... If there is a problem, given that the governance is based on problems being solved by the Ones affected, I imagine any problems will be solved.
The Ones with money now have the power to control the ownership, production and distribution of everything. Once that authority evaporates what will replace profit to motivate the decision making in the supply chains?
People who care. People who are having a problem affect Them and come together to Ethically solve for it. Automation will be used a lot... Robots and other such. And it's not like it's "flip the switch." As the cost of energy is removed down the line, things will get cheaper and cheaper.
Problems will be worked on as they crop up. It's likely to take a decade before collecting the penny for the house (or whatever) is more energy than it's worth...
I prefer the Asian version - Do not do unto Others that which You would not want done to You. But yes, the three Laws of Ethics are "the golden rule" (Natural Law) expressed as the three things not to do.
Mis information; dis information and lies!!! April 16, 2024
“Governments are instituted among People, deriving their Just powers from the consent of the governed.” Exactly who are those that are governed? Only United States citizens. Where are they found? Washington District of Columbia, forts, ports and needful buildings and employees and dependents such as those in the military, civil service, elected, appointed and the like. The de facto States are subdivisions of the de facto United States. There is zero law only color of law. Except on Oregon.
Not all of us, as men and women, with our progeny on the land and soil of the several states, commonwealths and territories are US citizens. All of us that are not on the property of the United States of Washington District of Columbia [Inc] or employed by it or not with a proper oath that has not been discharged, we are not United States citizens. Those in that group are U.S. citizens. When they have their bona fides in order. When they make the claim and cannot support the claim, in the case of the elected or appointed, with oath, bond and other qualifications, they are outlaw.
In a lawful state, such as de jure not the current de facto, people can and do choose to expatriate from their sovereign state of being to enter another jurisdiction. As an example stepping down from sovereign to citizen, when elected or appointed, commissioned, warranted, or enlisted. There may be additional options. Consent is required and it must be accompanied by the proper bona fides for the position. It is said, that one of us can verbally consent to being a United States citizen. I deny that verbal option. Such as in a courtroom, when asked “are you a U.S. citizen.” Under the admiralty law form, “he who can be deceived let him,” an affirmative answer can change your jurisdiction from that of a sovereign to citizen. That is fraud as the totality of the situation was not explained and the affirmation could be in ignorance of the reality. I declare ignorance of that law by a sovereign, in this case, is totally excusable until there is a complete and common understanding in written form. Consider this, 12 to 15 % of the adult population is not smart enough to join the military, but they vote, drive and stand trial.
There has not been a lawful state among the several states or the United States since March 1861. Oregon is the single known exception. The same route taken by the people on Oregon is available to the other 32 states and 17 territories. Basically, in the history of our earth, the provenance of a sovereign man or woman begins with the “unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America 1776; followed by the 1777 Confederation and perpetual Union’s Articles followed by The United States of America’s Constitution, it is our last article, and its final lawful iteration is dated 1859 with Oregon as the final lawful state among the several states.”
To become the single exception to martial law of the United States of Washington District of Columbia Inc. [in some form] circa post 1861, a process was taken step by step. This was done by the now, provisional government on Oregon aka Oregon Statewide Jural Assembly. First we Assembled as in Amendment I, then we formed a social compact as in ARTICLE I Section 1 of Oregon’s Constitution. Then we formed a Civilian common law Court of record and implemented ex parte Milligan (SCOTUS) thereby nullifying martial law / Lieber code / FEMA.
We then formed a Jury Pool of men and women, sovereigns, with their bona fides in order. Grand Juries was called and appeared and found presentments and true bills. The Presentments were served to 38 Prosecutors on Oregon and the true bills went to our Article III Amendment VII court. Our court brought forth verdicts without appeal in fact and provided them to the USDOJ, USMS, FBI, USMC, State of Oregon aka STATE OF OREGON’s executive, legislative and judiciary, 36 Sheriff and 38 prosecutors on Oregon. They all acquiesced an defaulted. What took www.orsja.org 4.5 years to do can be accomplished on paper, by the other 32 states and 17 territories in 30 days. Signed, sealed, stamped, witnessed with proof of service. You will find all of this and instructions at no fee www.orsja.org.
Correct Me if I am wrong, but is that not all founded on legal works? And truthfully, without money in the mix, there is no need for such convolutions. Three Laws, and We all ensure they are not broken, and move to solve for the problem of One choosing unEthical behavior.
We all work to solve the problems that affect Us.
I do not consent to any legal thing. I stand under the three Laws, sovereign and free. Though I do applaud efforts to correct things in this moneyed society and see that You have done well towards freeing Humanity - in Your area of Our planet.
I aim for planetary freedom, for once free energy is flowing, it will affect everything everywhere. Money use on Our planet will dissipate.
You are corrected. We are lawful, not legal. An easy test. Legal is lawful with God removed. There is no money involved in the motivation of www.orsja.org. your three laws? Newton, physics, motion, robotics. Is God included.
Planetary freedom is not feasible. Look at the situation of the bell curve. Most people are persons and want to be governed. They are as frogs in the pan of water. Go find another nation where the people have actually done the work to be free! There isn't another. Society gains its authority from the government. Assemblies provide authority to the government.
There are hundreds of Assemblies and not one other assembly has done the work the orsja.org has done. Tom said to me I'll wait to see if you succeed or go to jail. Are you on the land of The United States of America? What evidence do you have that proves your identity and status as sovereign without ruler or subjects?
I think you are an intellectual that thinks, reads, writes and has not and probably will not Assemble and do the work.
Perhaps it depends on how We define "God." All Ethical things are God, and choosing unEthical behavior is beneath the beasts, because One knows better and still makes that choice.
Ethical consequences should be given to Those who choose unEthical behavior. behavior. They are not of God.
Lawful is Ethical; legal is mostly not, and where it is, it is only because the psychopaths in control want Us to think that justice can be served in Their system. But We're just Their participatory audience, while They use live props in the production.
And They support it all legally by "giving immunity," "sealing records," and on and on.
I see Us, aggregate Consciousness as co-Gods co-creating the Now with Our choices of behavior. And I suggest We co-create vastly better:
There is the definition since 1776 ) to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them... You are delusional a co-God. How arrogant. I was baptized at 13 in 1951. I rejected religion in my 20s but I believe in God and God believes in me. Ethics are not enough to return us to a Constitutional republican form of government this year 2024. www.orsja.org
I don't want a constitutional republic. I want a society of Ethical sovereigns.
And how is it arrogant to see You as a co-God? And every other sapient One in Our universe?
I was raised without religion - lots of love and Ethics, but no religion. And I do not care what You believe, what You think, what You look like, what Your genetics, I care whether You choose Your behavior Ethically, which, I presume, You do.
We may not get along, but I honor You as an Ethical One. Love always.
Then you are not located in the correct place, if you are on the land and soil of The United States of America. Because we are guaranteed Article IV Section 4 a Constitutional republican form of government. Therefore, you are in the category of those looking to overthrow our country just like the mulims and Communists and socialists. If you equate yourself and others as co-Gods then you are not in compliance with the founding of sovereign people on this earth. Leave as you are subversive. It is obvious you do not comprehend the definition of God. How can you have an ethical society of sovereigns as you do not comprehend where sovereign comes from and the definition see Bouvier Law Dictionary 1856. A great do gooder concept with no practical thoughts to go with it.
Love always is fantasy and you appear to be a zealot incapable of pulling it off. www.orsja.org
Do not hurt or kill? Every breath you take is consuming oxygen that someone else could use to keep alive; it's impossible to live without hurting others and killing plants and/or animals (at the least).
Don't take or damage what belongs to others? Everything and everyone actually belongs to whatever government protects you from being killed by other governments, but (for sake of argument) let's call "what is yours" anything that you have created WITHOUT USING ANYTHING THAT YOU HAVEN'T CREATED: in other words, exactly NOTHING; everything you create is created by a mind, body and society that exist solely due to the government's defense of your part of ITS domain. If your government can't protect you, then you end up DEAD (like the Canaanites, or in open air prisons like the North American indigenous and the Palestinians, etc etc.)
NB. "The Government" is a scalable concept: if you are the only person on a deserted island, then "the government" is YOU; should you have children on your deserted island, then YOU are the government of your children. Should some pirates show up and throw you and your kids in chains, then it's pretty clear who the government is NOW: if you can't defend it, then you don't own it.
Don't Defraud???? Sorry to have to break it to you, but your whole schtick is an attempt to DEFRAUD your readers regarding the REALITY OF OUR SITUATION: if WE aren't the government, then WE ARE PROPERTY. Should you care to help me in my quest to enable WE THE PEOPLE to "take over the reins of government", find alanforcongress in the Library of Congress
https://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20101202174601/http://www.alanforcongress.com/
or call or text AJ at 586-422-5526.
Did You see the word, “willfully?” Did You see the word, “anOther?” Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of s sentient, sapient Being. i.e., Human or ET.
No, actually, the controlminds (governments) only operate with the consent of the governed. If no One consented, standing sovereign on Ethical ground, Those who think They have the mythical status of “authority” would have no power.
And I am not wasting My time on the rest of Your illogical diatribe, complicating the simple.
Maybe know that the planet belongs to ALL of Us…
Trusts: The Big Heist Against Humanity (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/trusts-the-big-heist-against-humanity
This is the purest vision of freedom that I have ever seen, simply described because the truth is simple. I wonder however about the distribution of goods. If the product I produce is needed in 100 different locations but I only have enough to send to 50 of them then who and how are the shipping decisions made? Also, if I am a public distribution point (formerly called a store) and I have 50 units of a product but 100 people each want at least one unit then who and how are the distribution decisions made? If the first person wants 5 units then it won't take long to run out of product.
First, everything is first come-first served after the creator gives to the Ones They want to. There is nothing that some Other cannot provide that will fill any need. Maybe there is not enough lobster for All who want lobster, and the first-come get it, but this does not mean everyOne else will starve...
As for quantity offered per Person... That would be the choice of the lobster-provider.
And yes, lobster is likely to run out rapidly, and People will have to make do with shrimp, or clams, or...
I was thinking more about essential products needed to feed the supply chains, things like natural resources, building materials, steel, metals & alloys, primary foodstuffs, machinery & equipment, medical supplies, electronic components, appliances, cars, boats, etc.
Given that We have been making do with what We have produced, and getting it distributed, I doubt there will be a problem once the automation of things takes over all the necessary work no One wants to do. And... If there is a problem, given that the governance is based on problems being solved by the Ones affected, I imagine any problems will be solved.
Solutocracy – A Way to Govern (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/solutocracy-a-way-to-govern
I surely cannot solve for all problems. I leave it to the Ones who care to do most of that.
The Ones with money now have the power to control the ownership, production and distribution of everything. Once that authority evaporates what will replace profit to motivate the decision making in the supply chains?
People who care. People who are having a problem affect Them and come together to Ethically solve for it. Automation will be used a lot... Robots and other such. And it's not like it's "flip the switch." As the cost of energy is removed down the line, things will get cheaper and cheaper.
Problems will be worked on as they crop up. It's likely to take a decade before collecting the penny for the house (or whatever) is more energy than it's worth...
The original Golden Rule.
Treat others as you'd have them treat you.
Don't kill
Don't steal
I prefer the Asian version - Do not do unto Others that which You would not want done to You. But yes, the three Laws of Ethics are "the golden rule" (Natural Law) expressed as the three things not to do.
Mis information; dis information and lies!!! April 16, 2024
“Governments are instituted among People, deriving their Just powers from the consent of the governed.” Exactly who are those that are governed? Only United States citizens. Where are they found? Washington District of Columbia, forts, ports and needful buildings and employees and dependents such as those in the military, civil service, elected, appointed and the like. The de facto States are subdivisions of the de facto United States. There is zero law only color of law. Except on Oregon.
Not all of us, as men and women, with our progeny on the land and soil of the several states, commonwealths and territories are US citizens. All of us that are not on the property of the United States of Washington District of Columbia [Inc] or employed by it or not with a proper oath that has not been discharged, we are not United States citizens. Those in that group are U.S. citizens. When they have their bona fides in order. When they make the claim and cannot support the claim, in the case of the elected or appointed, with oath, bond and other qualifications, they are outlaw.
In a lawful state, such as de jure not the current de facto, people can and do choose to expatriate from their sovereign state of being to enter another jurisdiction. As an example stepping down from sovereign to citizen, when elected or appointed, commissioned, warranted, or enlisted. There may be additional options. Consent is required and it must be accompanied by the proper bona fides for the position. It is said, that one of us can verbally consent to being a United States citizen. I deny that verbal option. Such as in a courtroom, when asked “are you a U.S. citizen.” Under the admiralty law form, “he who can be deceived let him,” an affirmative answer can change your jurisdiction from that of a sovereign to citizen. That is fraud as the totality of the situation was not explained and the affirmation could be in ignorance of the reality. I declare ignorance of that law by a sovereign, in this case, is totally excusable until there is a complete and common understanding in written form. Consider this, 12 to 15 % of the adult population is not smart enough to join the military, but they vote, drive and stand trial.
There has not been a lawful state among the several states or the United States since March 1861. Oregon is the single known exception. The same route taken by the people on Oregon is available to the other 32 states and 17 territories. Basically, in the history of our earth, the provenance of a sovereign man or woman begins with the “unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America 1776; followed by the 1777 Confederation and perpetual Union’s Articles followed by The United States of America’s Constitution, it is our last article, and its final lawful iteration is dated 1859 with Oregon as the final lawful state among the several states.”
To become the single exception to martial law of the United States of Washington District of Columbia Inc. [in some form] circa post 1861, a process was taken step by step. This was done by the now, provisional government on Oregon aka Oregon Statewide Jural Assembly. First we Assembled as in Amendment I, then we formed a social compact as in ARTICLE I Section 1 of Oregon’s Constitution. Then we formed a Civilian common law Court of record and implemented ex parte Milligan (SCOTUS) thereby nullifying martial law / Lieber code / FEMA.
We then formed a Jury Pool of men and women, sovereigns, with their bona fides in order. Grand Juries was called and appeared and found presentments and true bills. The Presentments were served to 38 Prosecutors on Oregon and the true bills went to our Article III Amendment VII court. Our court brought forth verdicts without appeal in fact and provided them to the USDOJ, USMS, FBI, USMC, State of Oregon aka STATE OF OREGON’s executive, legislative and judiciary, 36 Sheriff and 38 prosecutors on Oregon. They all acquiesced an defaulted. What took www.orsja.org 4.5 years to do can be accomplished on paper, by the other 32 states and 17 territories in 30 days. Signed, sealed, stamped, witnessed with proof of service. You will find all of this and instructions at no fee www.orsja.org.
Correct Me if I am wrong, but is that not all founded on legal works? And truthfully, without money in the mix, there is no need for such convolutions. Three Laws, and We all ensure they are not broken, and move to solve for the problem of One choosing unEthical behavior.
We all work to solve the problems that affect Us.
I do not consent to any legal thing. I stand under the three Laws, sovereign and free. Though I do applaud efforts to correct things in this moneyed society and see that You have done well towards freeing Humanity - in Your area of Our planet.
I aim for planetary freedom, for once free energy is flowing, it will affect everything everywhere. Money use on Our planet will dissipate.
You are corrected. We are lawful, not legal. An easy test. Legal is lawful with God removed. There is no money involved in the motivation of www.orsja.org. your three laws? Newton, physics, motion, robotics. Is God included.
Planetary freedom is not feasible. Look at the situation of the bell curve. Most people are persons and want to be governed. They are as frogs in the pan of water. Go find another nation where the people have actually done the work to be free! There isn't another. Society gains its authority from the government. Assemblies provide authority to the government.
There are hundreds of Assemblies and not one other assembly has done the work the orsja.org has done. Tom said to me I'll wait to see if you succeed or go to jail. Are you on the land of The United States of America? What evidence do you have that proves your identity and status as sovereign without ruler or subjects?
I think you are an intellectual that thinks, reads, writes and has not and probably will not Assemble and do the work.
Perhaps it depends on how We define "God." All Ethical things are God, and choosing unEthical behavior is beneath the beasts, because One knows better and still makes that choice.
Ethical consequences should be given to Those who choose unEthical behavior. behavior. They are not of God.
Lawful is Ethical; legal is mostly not, and where it is, it is only because the psychopaths in control want Us to think that justice can be served in Their system. But We're just Their participatory audience, while They use live props in the production.
And They support it all legally by "giving immunity," "sealing records," and on and on.
I see Us, aggregate Consciousness as co-Gods co-creating the Now with Our choices of behavior. And I suggest We co-create vastly better:
Blueprint for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/blueprint-for-a-society-of-ethical
I have no religion but am very spiritual. Love always.
There is the definition since 1776 ) to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them... You are delusional a co-God. How arrogant. I was baptized at 13 in 1951. I rejected religion in my 20s but I believe in God and God believes in me. Ethics are not enough to return us to a Constitutional republican form of government this year 2024. www.orsja.org
I don't want a constitutional republic. I want a society of Ethical sovereigns.
And how is it arrogant to see You as a co-God? And every other sapient One in Our universe?
I was raised without religion - lots of love and Ethics, but no religion. And I do not care what You believe, what You think, what You look like, what Your genetics, I care whether You choose Your behavior Ethically, which, I presume, You do.
We may not get along, but I honor You as an Ethical One. Love always.
Then you are not located in the correct place, if you are on the land and soil of The United States of America. Because we are guaranteed Article IV Section 4 a Constitutional republican form of government. Therefore, you are in the category of those looking to overthrow our country just like the mulims and Communists and socialists. If you equate yourself and others as co-Gods then you are not in compliance with the founding of sovereign people on this earth. Leave as you are subversive. It is obvious you do not comprehend the definition of God. How can you have an ethical society of sovereigns as you do not comprehend where sovereign comes from and the definition see Bouvier Law Dictionary 1856. A great do gooder concept with no practical thoughts to go with it.
Love always is fantasy and you appear to be a zealot incapable of pulling it off. www.orsja.org