Discussion about this post

User's avatar
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

Thank You...as I am 59+, I am at the crossroads, all signs point to me not receiving my retirement until 67 unless (or ever?) I file for disability sooner (tinnitus and heart palps from 5G/smartmeter). Furthermore, I will not be participating in any digital ID's or CBDC's, will never touch a cellphone again. As a citizen, I am required to reject illegitimate actions of government. There is definitely some stubborn mules in my family tree. Best from Oregon

Expand full comment
Corona Studies's avatar

Most people cannot handle the thought that there is so much evil in the world, and I think it might actually be preferable (practically speaking) to not think in terms of evil at all.

What if we put dogs in charge of every aspect of social organisation and resources management?

Dogs are not evil, and yet we'd end up with pretty much the same world that we currently have. Like the psychopathic 'elite', dogs have very little self control and they are terrible at resource management (think of a plate of sausages left unattended).

If we view the 'elite' as essentially dogs in suits then it becomes clear that WE are the problem for ever thinking we could let them run society on our behalf without them scoffing all the sausages, shitting everywhere and generally running amuck.

Leaving a plate of sausages unattended on the floor and then hitting your dog when you come back and found he's eaten the lot is the wrong approach. The fault lies with the dog owner, and not the dog. The dog cannot help being a dog. In the same way we must accept that the 'elite' cannot help being the psychopaths they are. And so we must not ever give them responsibilities that they are incapable of handling responsibly.

The 'elite' are broken humans - whether through childhood trauma (sexual abuse, neglect, torture etc), elite boarding schools, crazy societies or selective breeding - and so they have less moral accountability than normal people (in the same way that abused or neglected dogs have less moral accountability than their owners).

Putting Schwab, Gates or Ghebreyesus in charge of healthcare or any other aspect of social organisation is no different to letting your dog drive your car down the freeway. The resulting death and injury is in the hands of the person making that catastrophic error of judgement. The person sitting in the back seat reading a book, while their dog drives the car at 100mph.

It's the 'voters', the 'flag wavers' and the 'cheering crowds' who are the problem (the dog owners) and not the 'elite' themselves (the unruly dogs).

One of the roles of the political elite is to take the blame for the current carnage (vaccines, a war, economic collapse etc) so that we (the masses) continue to blame them and not us. Blaming them reinforces the idea that they should be in charge. And that fatal dynamic is why nothing ever changes and the world is always in such a terrible state.

The last 4 years have been a masterclass in psychopathy. It is clear that these people are closer to robots than human beings. This is why the solution can only be to appeal to the masses - the 'voters', the doctors, the enforcers, the managers - and point out how THEY are morally responsible for the state of the world for outsourcing their brains and decision making to the most damaged and dysfunctional people in society.

Expand full comment
39 more comments...

No posts