Yesterday I was apprised that Sam Bailey had included Me in what turned out to resemble a hit piece more than anything else. It wasn’t specifically directed at Me, but One who claims to be the originator of work attributed by the Baileys (Mark and Sam) to another One.
According to Poisoned Kiwi, who is Craig Hutchinson, while He was very ill and recovering from poisoning He worked with a man called John Bevan-Smith (JBS), who moved in with Him to basically take dictation of science and facts aimed at a legal case relative to the COVID-19 fraud.
At some point JBS left, taking with Him all the work. And proceeded to present the work to the Baileys as His own. Mark used the data in His publication, A Farewell to Virology, attributing it to JBS.
Craig, seeing the attribution, reached out to the Baileys to set the record straight and was ignored.
This prompted Him to write this piece:
Rather than reaching out to see if the issue could be ironed out and some resolution arrived at, rather than choosing a gracious route initially, Sam put out this video (with comments turned off and no flame/splat – basically thumbs up/down – available):
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Narcissists-Who-Hate-The-Baileys:0
I have had a fair amount of discourse with Craig since I joined Substack, and had no reason to think He would make this up. So in the comments I expressed My aghastment at the scumminess of some People – and singled out “one of Them,” meaning JBS, and then pointed to My less than gracious experience with Sam Bailey. (See link below to My open letter to Her regarding this matter – She never had the grace to discuss it. [shrug])
I offered hope that Sam would get back with Him and sort things out.
Well… Instead, that “hit piece” came out, and to top it off, several People who gave supportive comments to Craig were on a list They showed. Though They did not single out most on that list, They did pick out a couple. And though I was not picked out, I was on that list. And later, I (My name and icon) was displayed with Others and a pile of shit teaming with flies. (How gracious…)
Another One pointed Me to Sam’s Substack with the video in it and I proceeded to comment on it (shown here in two screenshots to capture the whole of what I wrote):
When I pressed the “Post” button, I was told that it could not be restacked:
So I turned off the restack option and lo and behold!:
Sam gracefully ensured I could not reply.
Well, I must say that all this graciousness has encouraged Me to remain unimpressed. Refusing to engage when a claim is made, attacking Others pretty much out of the blue, and outright blocking of the People One has attacked is...at best, beastly.
So to Sam Bailey I say, if You have issues with Me, You are welcome to address Me in comments. I have only blocked one Person on Substack and that was because that One was harassing Me and would not quit even when I requested an end to Our discourse, giving warning that I would be blocking if the harassment continued.
I don’t block People who are willing to discuss things rationally.
Please, Sam, Let’s discuss Your motivation to behave as You did. I am quite curious why You chose Me to take Your shit on.
And as I pointed out to one of Your supporters who attacked Me with logical fallacy in comments on Kiwi’s post, any publicity is good publicity, so I must thank You for that! It will help in My efforts to put forth My work for Humanity to solve for the psychopaths in control, who brought Us the plannedemic and so much more.
.
.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
.
.
Links to info:
.
.
Open Letter to Dr. Sam Bailey (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-dr-sam-bailey
Solving for Psychopaths in Control (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/solving-for-psychopaths-in-control
Who Do You Think Did This? (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/who-do-you-think-did-this
A Better Economic System (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/a-better-economic-system
They Don’t Teach Ethics Anymore (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/they-dont-teach-ethics-anymore
Trusts: The Big Heist Against Humanity (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/trusts-the-big-heist-against-humanity
.
.
.
Signature:
.
.
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
.
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
.
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
.
.
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
.
Love always.
In My haste, I failed to point out this about Sam's video:
Why did She deal with anything and everything She could find in that hit piece of Hers except who was the progenitor of the work JSB offered Mark and Her?
That was the core of the article by Kiwi. The motivator of the whole thing. Yet that single point is never addressed.
Right there We have to question the motive.
I was on 'the list' too but have been blocked by Sam Bailey for some time. I commented on this issue last night when Eric F. Coppolino posted about it. https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/the-poorly-attempted-besmirching