I Have Authority Over You
And You can delegate My authority to be over everyOne else!
Today, millions will be going to choose who will have authority over Themselves. But not just that, They will be choosing who will be ruling over You… Unless…
You don’t consent.
You see, I cannot honestly say I have authority over You, no matter how many or of what type of titles I take on. I may be a sovereign but that sovereignty is limited to Myself and My crowndom, My possessions. I cannot say that because I am a sovereign, that I am Your sovereign.
Neither can You claim any authority over Me, presuming You have chosen to take Your sovereignty over Self and crowndom. You cannot tell Me what to do with Me and Mine as I cannot tell You what to do with You and Yours.
Only if You assign Me authority over You, can I then take it – and You can rescind that assignment at any time. Just as I can assign You authority over Me and take it back at any time. The probability of You assigning Me authority over You is slim, to say the least, and vise versa.
Thus seeing all These People assigning authority over Themselves and Their crowndom to People that moneyed interests put up on a stage to “vote” for is rather odd, in My view. But the kicker is that They think They can claim the One chosen (whether actually by a majority of Them or otherwise) has authority over Me!
Just because, by happenstance, I plant My feet in this area of Our planet with no real choice otherwise.
But the truth is that where I plant My feet is Mine. I own the ground I touch with My body (clothed or unclothed). No Other can take that away. The specific ground may change – I walk, and My feet claim ground and relinquish ground as I move, but wherever I stand, that is My land.
No Other can stand upon the exact ground I stand on, and so I own it 100%. I am sovereign of that ground. And when I lie down to sleep, so the ground under My body, that ground I touch (semantics of bed and all: irrelevant) is Mine.
So irrespective of where I am, the jurisdiction is Mine alone.
I have authority over Me, and none who I have not given, in explicit terms and directly, can assume authority over Me. Of course… I have no authority over You – where You are is Yours. I cannot take the specific spot Your flesh is on. I might move You from a spot, but then the new spot You’re on is Yours. I cannot be on the spot You’re on.
Given all this… There is no way any of Us can assign authority to One over any Other. I have no authority over You but I can say that Joe Blow (or The Donald, or Special K, or some “king” or whoever) has authority over You? I think not.
I can acquiesce My Self authority to any of Those – that is My sovereign right. But I cannot say You must do so as well. And even if You didn’t “vote” for the One that “wins,” the “winner” has authority over You – in that system “voting” acquiesces to.
Yet here We see so Many accepting that if lots of People “vote” for Joe Blow, then Joe Blow can tell Them what to do. That Joe Blow has authority over Them.
Beyond that, They accept that a system of legalates (nothing in the legal/governmental system is a Law – see Calling a Legalate a Law linked below), the number of which no One knows, has “authority” over Them. They accept that They need permission to have pets, to operate vehicles, to collect rain water… And on and on.
There are only three Laws, Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do, that All must stand under or face Ethical consequences. These cover the things that no One would say would be okay to do to Them – everything else is a matter of taste. Yet there are all those millions who think that because Joe Blow (or some “elected official”) put a legalate in, Others must follow.
No, actually, I don’t have authority over You – unless You break one of those three Laws, and then We all have authority to mete Ethical consequences to You. Including (vernacular – no need for legal “but not limited to;” there are other Ethical consequences that could be applied) taking You out of social circulation (locking You up).
And You don’t have authority over Me.
Needless to say, I do not consent to anyOne having any authority over Me. None of that legal/governmental mess applies to Me. I stand on Ethical ground, not in the legal sewer where I must accept that Others can assign “authority” to yet Others over Me.
How about You? Are You going out to “vote” for a system that You think has authority over Me?
Or do You stand sovereign too?
P.S. In that legal/governmental system You have to register to “vote,” and that is what They really want. In that legal/governmental system, any time You register anything, You are giving it to the state – to do with and to it as the state sees fit – in exchange for a privilege. In the case of registering to vote, You are giving Your sovereignty, Your Self, to the state – to do with and to You as it sees fit – in exchange for the privilege of wasting time in a booth.
The for-profit corporation, USA Inc., appoints its officers, holds "elections" to maintain the illusion We have a say, "counts" the "votes," and tells Us who "won" (who They appointed).
They don’t care who You “vote” for, just that You register.
.
.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
.
.
Links to My work for Humanity:
.
Calling a Legalate a Law (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/calling-a-legalate-a-law
“Someday Real Soon Now SomeOne Will Fix It for Me!” (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/someday-real-soon-now-someone-will
Ethical Contracts vs. Legal Contracts (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/ethical-contracts-vs-legal-contracts
Just Stop Consenting! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/just-stop-consenting
Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical
Trusts: The Big Heist Against Humanity (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/trusts-the-big-heist-against-humanity
.
.
.
Signature:
.
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
.
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
.
Love always.
Excellent post! Standing on ethical ground is at the core of Sovereignty.
Voting is an abdication of ethical Standing because it delegates Unlawful behavior to be carried out by others.
When we are in touch with our inner nature, we simply cannot violate those ethical principles, you mention. 🙏
Amy you hit it out of the park again. So succinct and like arrows to the points. This simple little principle - that I own the land I walk on, that I am my own person and that you are yours, seems very hard to inject into people's heads. It's a simple premise that ensures the safety of everyone more than any other principle does. So many go around fearing everything and yet they hand their power over to someone else enabling them to be tyrannized and dictated to. And nothing is more life-threatening than that. But they don't see it. They are in a spell for sure.