Our The United State of America's Constitution was created by our Congress Assembled, the first law. The Congress hired Bouvier to make a specific dictionary for our Constitution. Lookup sovereign. de facto and de jure are not in Bouvier 1856. The definitions vary. I like Black's 6th page 416.
You say you are sovereign. Prove it. Do you know how to support your claim? There is over 150 years of law saying you are a US citizen. We have incontrovertible sovereign evidence on Oregon. Happy to share what we know. After 8 Grand Juries and 7 Article III Amendment VII Civilian common law Court trials we have some knowledge.
To make a change like that. Share the plan you will use to successfully aim at removing money and substitutung Ethics.
It sounds like you will make what you wrote correct and you will be correct. We know where we are going and from whence we came one step at a time for 6 years of success. Not one rebuttal.
Humbly… I am sovereign under the three Laws of Ethics ONLY. I do not care what legal definitions say. Sovereign = no Other above One. No Other is “authority.” As long as I choose My behavior Ethically. I expect and demand that I be left alone unless I accept contact.
The Constitution was mainly a trade compact. Only the Bill of Rights was Ethically motivated, and that was tossed in 1871,
Humbly I think not. At this time. I'm sure you know it when you wrote it.
It takes a Living testimony in the form of an affidavit of truth and you need to do better that what you just wrote. Then you need two witnesses to your declation that signs a jerat for you. signed, sealed, stamped, witnessed and proof of service filed into a Court of record
It goes like this: our unanimous Declaration of the united States of America 1776; the Confederation and pertpetual Union's Constitution circa 1859. The several states are party to that document. People are 3rd party beneficiaries; people are party to our state's Constitutions circa 1859. It is de facto, color of law, incorpoated governance in some form of industrial / Military /BAR martial law. Except on Oregon. You have a lot of misinformation.
This is only the second of your substack posts I've read but I'm so grateful to you for providing this information and your message of hope - no matter what befalls this earth or humanity, this shines true and brings relief from the suffering put upon us because it is the truth that the owners don't want us to realize - because knowing and abiding by these truths will be their undoing. Thank you.
Oh! Yes! Hold my beer I got this one. However, focus on the solution, only here, nowhere else does the original jurisdiction of sovereign sui juris de jure ARTICLE I Section 1 appear. Military, likes psychopaths they beome snipers. Among others. get rewarded for killing people. Only Available to any that refuse to comply with any infringement upon their unalienable rights. www.orsja.org
Agreed. For some reason I cannot just like. I must comment. Article III read it about 20 times. Then a open Bouvier 1856. Then read your state's Constitution prior to 1859. You need to know about de facto and de jure. When one is a sovereign on the land and soil.
Bouvier is legal, not Lawful. The "Constitutions" are legal, not Lawful. "De facto" and "de jure" are legal terms.
I AM sovereign of My crowndom (Self and possessions). Anything defining and mandating and such is not applicable. Only the three Laws, which, being Natural Law, command Us all are applicable.
And most of what is in that legal system is money-related. I aim to remove money, making the simplicity of Ethics the prevailing modus operadi.
Amaterasu Solar sheers through the fake gloss of the cosmetic facades that the psychopathic elites paint over our understanding of Reality. She tells it as it is and you'd be wise to pay attention. Thank you Amaterasu for your unstinting efforts to bring much needed light to the dark smears pulled over our eyes by the "Controlminds" 🙏💜🙏
Our The United State of America's Constitution was created by our Congress Assembled, the first law. The Congress hired Bouvier to make a specific dictionary for our Constitution. Lookup sovereign. de facto and de jure are not in Bouvier 1856. The definitions vary. I like Black's 6th page 416.
You say you are sovereign. Prove it. Do you know how to support your claim? There is over 150 years of law saying you are a US citizen. We have incontrovertible sovereign evidence on Oregon. Happy to share what we know. After 8 Grand Juries and 7 Article III Amendment VII Civilian common law Court trials we have some knowledge.
To make a change like that. Share the plan you will use to successfully aim at removing money and substitutung Ethics.
It sounds like you will make what you wrote correct and you will be correct. We know where we are going and from whence we came one step at a time for 6 years of success. Not one rebuttal.
Humbly… I am sovereign under the three Laws of Ethics ONLY. I do not care what legal definitions say. Sovereign = no Other above One. No Other is “authority.” As long as I choose My behavior Ethically. I expect and demand that I be left alone unless I accept contact.
The Constitution was mainly a trade compact. Only the Bill of Rights was Ethically motivated, and that was tossed in 1871,
Humbly I think not. At this time. I'm sure you know it when you wrote it.
It takes a Living testimony in the form of an affidavit of truth and you need to do better that what you just wrote. Then you need two witnesses to your declation that signs a jerat for you. signed, sealed, stamped, witnessed and proof of service filed into a Court of record
It goes like this: our unanimous Declaration of the united States of America 1776; the Confederation and pertpetual Union's Constitution circa 1859. The several states are party to that document. People are 3rd party beneficiaries; people are party to our state's Constitutions circa 1859. It is de facto, color of law, incorpoated governance in some form of industrial / Military /BAR martial law. Except on Oregon. You have a lot of misinformation.
What is it that makes claims that I need all that? In My crowndom, such things are not necessary.
And I never signed any Declaration in 1776. Only the Ones who signed it are held to it. Never signed anything in 1859, either.
It's not misinfo, dear One, it's grasping that I signed nothing, don't consent to that mess, and it has no sway over Me.
You are no longer worth the effort.
A very clearly delivered rendition of telling it "like it is"
Thankyou for this fine effort , much appreciation☺️ KK
Most humble thanks for You payment of appreciation! You enrich Me! And most welcome. Here's hoping We all read and are moved!
Hitting them outta the park in this one! As always. Namaste and thank you.
🙏🏻🌹🙏🏻
Oh, thanks YOU for the payment of admiration! I am so enriched!!! Love always! 🤗 💜 🤗
This is only the second of your substack posts I've read but I'm so grateful to you for providing this information and your message of hope - no matter what befalls this earth or humanity, this shines true and brings relief from the suffering put upon us because it is the truth that the owners don't want us to realize - because knowing and abiding by these truths will be their undoing. Thank you.
Most humble thanks for Your payment of appreciation! I am enriched! Indeed, when enough of Us... 🙏🏻💜🙏🏻
Oh! Yes! Hold my beer I got this one. However, focus on the solution, only here, nowhere else does the original jurisdiction of sovereign sui juris de jure ARTICLE I Section 1 appear. Military, likes psychopaths they beome snipers. Among others. get rewarded for killing people. Only Available to any that refuse to comply with any infringement upon their unalienable rights. www.orsja.org
I don't consent to anything in that legal/governmental system. I consent to the three Laws only.
We don't need the complications in that ghastly system. That money-driven system.
Agreed. For some reason I cannot just like. I must comment. Article III read it about 20 times. Then a open Bouvier 1856. Then read your state's Constitution prior to 1859. You need to know about de facto and de jure. When one is a sovereign on the land and soil.
Bouvier is legal, not Lawful. The "Constitutions" are legal, not Lawful. "De facto" and "de jure" are legal terms.
I AM sovereign of My crowndom (Self and possessions). Anything defining and mandating and such is not applicable. Only the three Laws, which, being Natural Law, command Us all are applicable.
And most of what is in that legal system is money-related. I aim to remove money, making the simplicity of Ethics the prevailing modus operadi.
The Simplicity of Ethics (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-simplicity-of-ethics
Amaterasu Solar sheers through the fake gloss of the cosmetic facades that the psychopathic elites paint over our understanding of Reality. She tells it as it is and you'd be wise to pay attention. Thank you Amaterasu for your unstinting efforts to bring much needed light to the dark smears pulled over our eyes by the "Controlminds" 🙏💜🙏
I am so well paid in Your praise!!! Most humble thanks!!!
You are sure to be richly rewarded in the afterlife if not in this one, as is your just rewards. Love Always 🙏💜🙏
🤗 💜 🤗