Ethical Labeling vs Legal Labeling

How would things be different if Our foods were labeled Ethically?

As We know, the packaged stuff in the stores most of Us consider to be food is legally required to have ingredients listed. Except where the ingredients are less than some percentage. So, in theory – and perhaps in practice – if an ingredient is very unhealthy and only minute amounts are required to do damage, it could be added to Our food and legally be left off the label.

This, of course, is highly unEthical.

Ethically, every ingredient added must be listed. If it is not added but is known to be in something used, and could be a problem for Some, it must be listed as well – for example, glyphosate. Ethically, the buyer must have the full data on what They are buying. To hide anything that could pose an issue, irrespective of the amount, is very unEthical.

The Ones who create the legalates regarding food have ensured lots of wiggle room, so that They can profit more, and so the psychopaths in control can protect unEthical choices. The veneer of being for protection of the consumer is kept so We will trust the products, but all too often that trust is undermined.

Even the “organic” label, originally meaning pure, of nature, not tampered with, has deteriorated – though such labeled food tends to be better, there is no guarantee that the food is truly organic. It would seem that the Bill at the Gates of Hell has made the adding of Apeel, a toxic substance that increases shelf life, just fine for “organic” foods – legally.

And what is the motive in degrading Our food? Profit and control.

Ethically, organic food should be grown...organically. As food grows in nature, with caring tending and thoughtful production. Just as the label, “organic,” should guarantee. But profit – from foods that last unnaturally long, to the “medical” profit when We become ill – is always the motive in unEthical things done to Our food (and virtually all other unEthical things).

If there was no motive to make money off Our food, but rather the desire for a good reputation for providing the best, Our food supply would look nothing like it does now. Fillers, stabilizers, poisons, and other unhealthy things would be nowhere to be found.

And sometimes profit is not in terms of money, but in the ability to control. Sick People are easier to control than well People. People filled with stuff that makes Them placid (sodium fluoride and other similar things) are easier to control. And given We have psychopaths in control – by virtue of money – it is no surprise that Our food is ghastly.

A perfect path to control…

This is why I think it is vital that We ditch that unEthical legal/governmental system in favor of doing things Ethically. When Natural Law Ethics has the final say in what One can do, not the distortable insanity of the legal system, Humanity will be able to thrive.

No more Ethical things being illegal, and unEthical things legal. No more negative consequences for catching rain water, no more allowing toxins to be forced into flesh, with undisclosed issues, with claims of “safe and effective.”

And while We’re at it, I think it is vital to ditch the accounting for Our energy added into a system. When the profit is in money (energy accounting tokens be they eggs (trade/barter) or electronic bits (anything representational)), psychopaths will be promoted, because money = power, and psychopaths will do literally anything to get and keep that power over Others.

And thus money systems promote psychopaths to the top.

We have the technology to cease the accounting for Our energy added – free energy technologies do exist (see Electrogravitics – My Knowledge of Free Energy below). And free energy makes accounting for Our energy pointless. I would surely be experimenting and sharing successes freely, if I was not elderly, disabled, targeted, denied assistance, lost everything, nigh destitute, and homeless.

So My work is to encourage All who can do that work for Humanity to do so. To show why, and how things will be vastly better without a need for money. How the three Laws of Ethics are a far better choice for governance in society than that legal system that favors the psychopaths and dumps the rest of Us into the slums the psychopaths create.

Do not expect the 15 minute prisons They’re aiming for to be clean, shiny and rich.

Let’s start by requiring Our labels to be Ethical. All added ingredients, irrespective of quantity, must be listed. This will be just the first step to a fully Ethical and free world.

What can You do to make it happen?

.

---

As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.

.

.

Links to info:

.

Electrogravitics – My Knowledge of Free Energy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/electrogravitics-my-knowledge-of

Calling a Legalate a Law (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/calling-a-legalate-a-law

Trusts: The Big Heist Against Humanity (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/trusts-the-big-heist-against-humanity

Blueprint for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/blueprint-for-a-society-of-ethical

Solutocracy – A Way to Govern (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/solutocracy-a-way-to-govern

Solving for Poverty (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/solving-for-poverty

.

.

---

.

Signature:

.

.

Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar

http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia

.

Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar

http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change

.

The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar

http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella

.

.

My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.

I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"

When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.

From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).

I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...

I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.

And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.

Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?

And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.

So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.

.

Love always.