Shall We Define “Money?”

So Many think “money” is something that differs from what Others say it is

When I have been about on the web, I have discussed My solution to the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet, which involves eliminating the need for money. And when I say “money,” a large percentage will agree and say something like, “You’re right! Fiat must go and We should be back on the gold standard!”

Or, “We would do far better with trade and barter than with money!” Well, then I have to explain…

I was prompted to write this when I read this article (though the idea to write this had been percolating in My head a while:

https://blurt.blog/money/@yayogerardo/re-today-s-special-guest-khrom-1743912510692#@amaterasusolar/suarqx

First there was a quote of Khrom’s:

Money is simply a way of regulating the contribution that individual people make to obtaining various goods.

Well, that is close to My definition. It says, basically that money is the tool used to keep track of how much time/energy People added to the system to ensure They “deserve” what is available for Them to have.

Author of that article, yayogerardo (I adore the man!), claims the following:

Yes and No. It depends. Sorry my introverted nature is kicking in. I know you mean currency but first an explanation for the reader on the difference between money and currency.

Money and currency is not the same thing

Money is the value of things and currency is a representation of that value.

That was easy. But let's expand a little on both ends.

Money is not something we can touch, smell or taste or even see. It is not a physical thing. It is simply the value of goods and each goods has its own value. So thus, money is the measurement of that value and

Currency is the representative token of that value. It could be gold, silver, bills, coins, rocks, etc. it could be anything the masses want it to be, but it's fair to say it's much more simple and easier to keep safe that currency if it was not something heavy and over bulging our pockets. Cryptocurrency will eventually replace our standard physical currency I believe in the not so distant future. This doesn't mean Orwellian control over our assets. That's a different matter. Something I keep addressing in my LOC series like a broken record player.

And this prompted My comment:

I see We define "money" and "currency" differently – money is anything tangible (including electronic bits) that We use to account for the energy We added, use as proof that We plugged Our energy in somewhere to "deserve" a very small fraction of the wealth that is Ours (We each have a share of the wealth on Our planet, being born here, but They keep Our wealth in "TRUSTS").

Currency is anything that moves Us to create. This can include money, but also includes the social currencies. Doing things that make Others happy and then They pay One in thanks, love, appreciation, and other such social currencies.

And I contend that We do not need a physical tool keeping Us from Our wealth. We do not need money. In fact, it is a very dangerous tool, and very archaic.

It is dangerous because when it is physical, and needed to live comfortably (or live at all), it provides power to the haves over the have-nots, drawing psychopaths like feces draw flies to garner the most for the most power over the Ones who have little.

It promotes the psychopaths amongst Us to the top, giving Them control of Our planet. And then... Plannedemics, bankers' wars, experiments on Us (jabs), deteriorated education, control of media (offering lies), and on and on.

Social currencies, on the other hand, promote caring. Things are done the best way, not the cheapest way, or the way that builds control for the psychopaths.

And what makes money archaic is free energy tech – which the psychopaths presently in control avidly hide and suppress because Their single tool to power would vanish. They could not buy the things and the People to Their agendas.

Accounting for energy becomes pointless with free energy. 100% of the cost of everything is energy. The resources sit here freely but it takes energy to put them into useful configuration. Add free energy tech – and yes, I do know We have such tech – and We will see Our wealth returned to all of Us.

We're all multimillionaires. Why do We argue about the best way to retain Our slavery, robbed of Our wealth? We have tech that will do any job no One wants to do, and plenty of Us to do the rest – once all the money-pushing jobs are pointless…

Khrom assumes that We all must add Our energy, making a “contribution” to deserve some of what is produced, foundationally, by the planet We own. We use what Our planet provides freely, adding energy in making it into something Others want, and then selling it.

This is incorrect given today We do not need all of Us adding Our energy. Back in the day, before automation, robots and such, in times of scarcity, We did need to make sure everyOne was contributing. We needed all hands creating needed things and Ones who took but gave nothing added to the burden of Those doing the work, and this is what prompted the rise of money, making account for the energy added. First it was in goods and services – trade and barter. And when that became problematic, representational things, like shells and beads and then metals and beyond, emerged.

But consider that with automation and such, most jobs have moved into money-handling. Or doing things to profit “the owners” (sales and such). Jobs that We would not see if the S should HTF.

The jobs We need are in food production, clothing creation, shelter building, transportation, and communications. There are jobs that produce things We want but do not need. Specialty food, fancy clothes, mega-mansions, flashy cars… Even art and music are not vital for life. Surely these enhance Our lives, but if We see SHTF, People will be working on getting the foundational needs, and any art and music will be secondary.

Moving on to yayogerardo’s claim that “money” is the value of things… The “value” is arbitrary. To Me, something might be treasure. To You, it might be trash. But “money” is not that arbitrary evaluation. It is the tool that We use to define how much value We place on anything. If We’re willing to pay (money) in a specific amount for something, We define the value We give that something in that way.

As I said, currency is that which motivates Us to create. Like the current in a stream motivates objects to move along with it, or fish to swim against the stream to maintain location.

Again, I will point out that free energy is the key to releasing Humanity from the burden of having to find some way to plug Our energy in to afford to live. It is the key to having Our wealth, Our share of Our planet’s wealth, returned to Us, and the demise of the system with moneyed psychopaths in control. Money is Their only tool to power, allowing They to buy things and People to widespread agendas.

Imagine the renown, the fame, the glory the One(s) who gets the free energy tech out to Humanity will earn! I would if I could – I want that payment of social currency!!! – but as Most reading this know… I am not in the least positioned to do so.

May You be so positioned and motivated by that social currency to free Humanity from the slave chains of money.

.

.

---

As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.

.

.

Links to My work for Humanity:

.

80% of Us Merely Move Money (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/80-of-us-merely-move-money

Social Currency (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/social-currency

Solving for Financial Debt (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/solving-for-financial-debt

Money Has Bought This Poisonous World (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/money-has-bought-this-poisonous-world

I Want What's Mine (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/i-want-whats-mine

Money Has Bought This Poisonous World (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/money-has-bought-this-poisonous-world

.

.

.

Signature:

.

Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia

Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change

The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella

.

My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.

I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"

When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.

From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).

I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...

I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.

And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.

Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?

And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.

So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.

.

Love always.