Authorization is meaningless on its own, it only means someone says it's ok. That has no inherent moral implications of legitimacy or illegitimacy.
Legitimacy comes from actually caring about the best interests of everyone in your jurisdiction, not from authorization.
The real question is of delegation. Obviously illegitimate authority has no rules bc it's merely might makes right. But can legitimate authority be delegated? And the answer is sometimes.
Rights are individual and specific and cannot be delegated, but the power to manage and uphold them is fungible between people who hold them.
Anyone has the right to uphold anyone else's rights and doing so is acting defacto legitimately., whether or not they're authorized. Transfer of power by authorisation is legitimate when the tranferer and transferee only shift the legitimacy they already have, as a management decision from one locus to another. for efficiency.
Oh, I have seen the story on several sites too, but... I know the Ones in control here on Our planet (by virtue of money) create many "events" to pull Us one way or another and put them out on various platforms, keeping Us divided and thereby conquered. This, to Me, has the feel of such a creation.
Still, I do not know where to place the probabilities. There is some probability it's real.
We can. But not to a non-human entity for instance a system without losing all ethics. Doing so regardless equals, as you point out, subjecting oneself to faceless terror.
If we a forced to do so we must limit our engagement to things our integrity can accept and disentangle as soon as we can.
That is rather My point. [smile] We cannot have an Ethical system that has “authority” over everyOne. Only the Ones who accept any “authority” are under it.
That is why I aim for an Ethical anarchy, where the “rules” are the only Laws, and no One has authority over any Other unless They break those Laws.
Authorization is meaningless on its own, it only means someone says it's ok. That has no inherent moral implications of legitimacy or illegitimacy.
Legitimacy comes from actually caring about the best interests of everyone in your jurisdiction, not from authorization.
The real question is of delegation. Obviously illegitimate authority has no rules bc it's merely might makes right. But can legitimate authority be delegated? And the answer is sometimes.
Rights are individual and specific and cannot be delegated, but the power to manage and uphold them is fungible between people who hold them.
Anyone has the right to uphold anyone else's rights and doing so is acting defacto legitimately., whether or not they're authorized. Transfer of power by authorisation is legitimate when the tranferer and transferee only shift the legitimacy they already have, as a management decision from one locus to another. for efficiency.
Authorization without legitimacy is mere tyranny.
Precisely! Yes, We can consent to Some being the leaders, and if We consent those leaders may lead Us. If We do not consent, none may lead Us.
Speaking of authority, check this out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCZE5coE4bc
I had seen that. I do ponder - as I do with everything - whether that was real or staged… Not sure where to place the probabilities…
It's hard to say, but I have seen the story on other sites, so unfortunately it looks to be real.
Oh, I have seen the story on several sites too, but... I know the Ones in control here on Our planet (by virtue of money) create many "events" to pull Us one way or another and put them out on various platforms, keeping Us divided and thereby conquered. This, to Me, has the feel of such a creation.
Still, I do not know where to place the probabilities. There is some probability it's real.
Sad that we have to wonder if something is real these days.
Very true!
I just saw a video of him getting out of the hospital and talking to his supporters, here it is. https://www.bitchute.com/video/7vGmr07QCMZ9/?list=notifications&randomize=false
It looks pretty real, I don't know much about him so even if it is real, it could be staged.
Everyone who takes a vaccine is in "Authority Worship" mode.
Agreed! Glad I never have been… “Missed out” on the jab o’ toxins, I did.
We can. But not to a non-human entity for instance a system without losing all ethics. Doing so regardless equals, as you point out, subjecting oneself to faceless terror.
If we a forced to do so we must limit our engagement to things our integrity can accept and disentangle as soon as we can.
That is rather My point. [smile] We cannot have an Ethical system that has “authority” over everyOne. Only the Ones who accept any “authority” are under it.
That is why I aim for an Ethical anarchy, where the “rules” are the only Laws, and no One has authority over any Other unless They break those Laws.
Resonance is a good thing.
(-:
🤗 💜 🤗